S&P Financial Communications brings you Financial News This Week
 
 
October 22, 2007  
 
THIS WEEK'S TOP STORIES:
THE FC PERSPECTIVE: Paul Konstadt, Editor, on the Pitfalls of Chasing Big Gains >>
 
 
Tax Planning
Millions Overlooked Tax Breaks on 2006 Tax Returns
Millions of taxpayers neglected to claim potentially significant tax breaks in 2006 and a smaller yet noteworthy number erred by claiming IRA deductions for which they were too old to qualify, according to a recent report.
  • 2.1 million eligible taxpayers (an increase of 50% from 2005) did not deduct their state and local sales taxes. The combined value of the overlooked deductions was $3.6 billion.
  • 28% of filers failed to claim a one-time telephone excise-tax break, but about 93 million taxpayers requested a combined $4 billion in such refunds. The IRS had expected to refund twice that amount.
  • So many people over the age of 70½ claimed IRA deductions for which they were not eligible that the IRS has agreed to add a statement to the top of its IRA worksheet clarifying deduction rules.

The Wall Street Journal reported the story.

 
Financial Advisors
Many Advisors Weak on Own Succession Planning
A recent survey suggests that financial advisors may want to put more time into succession planning.
  • While the average age of advisors who participated in the survey was 53, 40% said they have done nothing to prepare their business for a potential sale.
  • When asked about their preferences for turning over the reigns, 29% wanted to sell to an existing partner and 12% each wanted to sell to an unidentified third party or to employees.
  • A good number were helping employees prepare for leadership: 46% sent employees to seminars and 35% each sponsored continuing education courses or had developed internal programs.

Investment Advisor published the survey results.

 
Institutional Investors
Chasing Performance Costs Pension Sponsors Up to $20 Billion a Year
Institutional investors are susceptible to the same investing mistakes as individual investors, according to academic researchers.
  • Pension plan sponsors are losing up to $20 billion annually — $60 billion over five years — by hiring investment managers based on superior past performance.
  • Over one-year time periods between 1989 and 2000, top-performing asset managers took in more than $19 billion in new money each year, compared to outflows of more than $10 billion for the worst performers.
  • One year later, the performance tables had reversed, and the worst managers had outperformed the previous best managers by 3.2% — and they kept outperforming three and five years later.

The findings were reported by FinancialWeek.com.

 
Personal Finance
Research Suggests Investors May Not Place Emphasis on Fees
New research suggests that whatever factors determine investors' fund selections, the fees associated with their choices are not a key driver.
  • Wharton MBA students and Harvard undergraduates were asked to choose among four passive funds indexed to the S&P 500. The only difference among the funds was their expense ratios. None of the Harvard undergrads and just 6% of the Wharton grad students opted for the low-cost fund. Even when given a supplemental information sheet highlighting the fees, few changed their selections.
  • In a second example, 400 Harvard University staffers were given a series of similar choices. Just 3% of the group put all of their money into the low-cost index funds after reading the prospectuses. When participants were given educational material about fees, only 9% chose the low-cost option.

The studies were reported in the online newsletter Lipper HedgeWorld.

 
 THE FC PERSPECTIVE:
Paul Konstadt, Editor, on the Pitfalls of Chasing Big Gains
"Because of Denver's high altitude, baseballs hit there tend to travel significantly farther than in most other cities. For many years, the Colorado Rockies baseball team tried to exploit this advantage by signing players primarily for their home run-hitting abilities. But the strategy failed because the Rockies unwisely ignored two crucial — and decidedly less glamorous — keys to success that have fueled their current playoff run: pitching and defense. It is the same with investment selection. People who focus on an investment's potential for future outsized gains — the equivalent of glamorous home runs — often miss other characteristics their portfolio might need to deliver meaningful long-term performance."
 
If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here.
 
© 2010 Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express permission of Standard & Poor's.
Terms of Use |  Privacy Policy
 
Our Editor's Pick
Hedge Funds Demystified
by Scott Frush
  • Explains differences between hedge funds and mutual funds
  • Presents methods for evaluating hedge funds
  • Discusses strategies for low, moderate, and high-risk investing

Product Spotlight
Visit S&P at SPARK
If you are attending the 2007 SPARK Forum next month, pay Standard & Poor’s a visit. From November 4-6, we will have a booth at the conference, which is being held at The Breakers in Palm Beach, Florida. Stop by and learn more about our suite of products and the chance to win great prizes, including an Apple iPhone. See you there!

 
Financial News This Week
Brought to you by Standard & Poor's Financial Communications and McGraw-Hill Professional